Human-in-the-loop Evaluation for Early Misinformation Detection: A Case Study of COVID-19 Treatments

Ethan Adrian Mendes, Yang Chen, Wei Xu, Alan Ritter

Main: Resources and Evaluation Main-poster Paper

Poster Session 5: Resources and Evaluation (Poster)
Conference Room: Frontenac Ballroom and Queen's Quay
Conference Time: July 11, 16:15-17:45 (EDT) (America/Toronto)
Global Time: July 11, Poster Session 5 (20:15-21:45 UTC)
Keywords: evaluation methodologies, evaluation
TLDR: We present a human-in-the-loop evaluation framework for fact-checking novel misinformation claims and identifying social media messages that support them. Our approach extracts check-worthy claims, which are aggregated and ranked for review. Stance classifiers are then used to identify tweets supp...
You can open the #paper-P2616 channel in a separate window.
Abstract: We present a human-in-the-loop evaluation framework for fact-checking novel misinformation claims and identifying social media messages that support them. Our approach extracts check-worthy claims, which are aggregated and ranked for review. Stance classifiers are then used to identify tweets supporting novel misinformation claims, which are further reviewed to determine whether they violate relevant policies. To demonstrate the feasibility of our approach, we develop a baseline system based on modern NLP methods for human-in-the-loop fact-checking in the domain of COVID-19 treatments. We make our data and detailed annotation guidelines available to support the evaluation of human-in-the-loop systems that identify novel misinformation directly from raw user-generated content.