Compositional Generalization without Trees using Multiset Tagging and Latent Permutations
Matthias Lindemann, Alexander Koller, Ivan Titov
Main: Syntax: Tagging, Chunking, and Parsing Main-poster Paper
Poster Session 7: Syntax: Tagging, Chunking, and Parsing (Poster)
Conference Room: Frontenac Ballroom and Queen's Quay
Conference Time: July 12, 11:00-12:30 (EDT) (America/Toronto)
Global Time: July 12, Poster Session 7 (15:00-16:30 UTC)
Keywords:
semantic parsing
TLDR:
Seq2seq models have been shown to struggle with compositional generalization in semantic parsing, i.e. generalizing to unseen compositions of phenomena that the model handles correctly in isolation.
We phrase semantic parsing as a two-step process: we first tag each input token with a multiset of o...
You can open the
#paper-P3504
channel in a separate window.
Abstract:
Seq2seq models have been shown to struggle with compositional generalization in semantic parsing, i.e. generalizing to unseen compositions of phenomena that the model handles correctly in isolation.
We phrase semantic parsing as a two-step process: we first tag each input token with a multiset of output tokens. Then we arrange the tokens into an output sequence using a new way of parameterizing and predicting permutations. We formulate predicting a permutation as solving a regularized linear program and we backpropagate through the solver. In contrast to prior work, our approach does not place a priori restrictions on possible permutations, making it very expressive.
Our model outperforms pretrained seq2seq models and prior work on realistic semantic parsing tasks that require generalization to longer examples. We also outperform non-tree-based models on structural generalization on the COGS benchmark.
For the first time, we show that a model without an inductive bias provided by trees achieves high accuracy on generalization to deeper recursion depth.