Hard Sample Aware Prompt-Tuning
Yuanjian Xu, Qi An, Jiahuan Zhang, Peng Li, Zaiqing Nie
Main: NLP Applications Main-poster Paper
Session 1: NLP Applications (Virtual Poster)
Conference Room: Pier 7&8
Conference Time: July 10, 11:00-12:30 (EDT) (America/Toronto)
Global Time: July 10, Session 1 (15:00-16:30 UTC)
Keywords:
educational applications, gec, essay scoring
TLDR:
Prompt-tuning based few-shot learning has garnered increasing attention in recent years due to its efficiency and promising capability. To achieve the best performance for NLP tasks with just a few samples, it is vital to include as many informative samples as possible and to avoid misleading ones. ...
You can open the
#paper-P5048
channel in a separate window.
Abstract:
Prompt-tuning based few-shot learning has garnered increasing attention in recent years due to its efficiency and promising capability. To achieve the best performance for NLP tasks with just a few samples, it is vital to include as many informative samples as possible and to avoid misleading ones. However, there is no work in prompt-tuning literature addressing the problem of differentiating informative hard samples from misleading ones in model training, which is challenging due to the lack of supervision signals about the quality of the samples to train a well-performed model. We propose a Hard Sample Aware Prompt-Tuning framework (i.e. HardPT) to solve the non-differentiable problem in hard sample identification with reinforcement learning, and to strengthen the discrimination of the feature space without changing the original data distribution via an adaptive contrastive learning method. An extensive empirical study on a series of NLP tasks demonstrates the capability of HardPT in few-shot scenarios. HardPT obtains new SOTA results on all evaluated NLP tasks, including pushing the SST-5 accuracy to 49.5\% (1.1\% point absolute improvement), QNLI accuracy to 74.6\% (1.9\% absolute improvement), NMLI accuracy to 71.5 (0.7\% absolute improvement), TACREV $F_1$-score to 28.2 (1.0 absolute improvement), and i2b2/VA $F_1$-score to 41.2 (1.3 absolute improvement).